Published May 25, 2010
[Note: This post is mostly the same as last year’s, but with updated information.]
Today, while crunching some numbers, I found out (approximately) what percentage of my practice is in the areas of criminal defense, DUI defense, traffic defense, and juvenile law. The following percentages are based on revenue, but I think that my time devoted to these areas closely follows the revenue percentages.
DUI Defense: 39%
Criminal Defense: 44%
Traffic Defense: 7%
Juvenile Delinquency/Juvenile Abuse: 5%
Accordingly, approximately 95% of my practice is in the areas of criminal defense, DUI defense, traffic defense, and juvenile law.
Published May 10, 2010
In the below video, players wearing white pass a ball a number of times. Are you good enough to count each pass?
h/t: Ray Ward
Published May 7, 2010
Evidence During Sentencing Hearings
During a sentencing hearing, both the defendant and the prosecution have the opportunity to present evidence that is relevant and reliable. No other rules of evidence apply, so evidence that is inadmissible at trial may be admissible at sentencing.
At sentencing, the defendant seeks mercy from the judge. The defendant introduces evidence that (hopefully) will convince the judge to show him as much mercy as possible. To reach this end, the defendant may testify himself and he may offer the testimony of his friends, family, and members of his community. The best evidence at sentencing hearings usually is, as Scott Ealy recently wrote, evidence that shows “specific post-crime conduct that demonstrates a firm and consistent resolve to make matters right.” For example, in a DUI case, evidence that a defendant completed alcohol counseling (and took it seriously) long before being ordered to do so, will be much more powerful than a defendant’s promise not to use or abuse alcohol again.